Ideal candidate for 3.5l swap?

Post your E12 technical questions and comments here. Please, no off-topic posts.

Moderators: Mike W., Pierre

Post Reply
Nick
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:56 am

Ideal candidate for 3.5l swap?

Post by Nick »

Been looking through the FAQ's and searching but there is lack luster information and it is difficult to sift through.

At some point I will be doing a 3.5 swap, but would like to make sure I am picking the right donor. I would love to be able just to move over all accessories and "drop" in the motor. It seems that the 3.5 from 6-7 series from 88 and back is the go-to choice. Is this the easiest/best choice?

From what I have been reading the B34 takes the same mounts and is a direct swap, although the B35 is more power and requires different mounts (not entirely direct).
1980 528i Automatic
User avatar
CabbageFumes
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:07 pm
Location: Funkytown

Post by CabbageFumes »

Any b34 is a direct bolt in. Only '89 e24 and some '89 b32 will have the correct casting on the block for a direct bolt it. Anything later b35 will need some kind of adapter plate for the engine mount, because the only castings compatible with e12 are from e23/. e28 chassis era (e28 and e24 used the same chassis in the eighties. Once e34/32 era came they changed the subframe and engine block bosses). Some things need to be used to make the he easier, like e12 water pump, power steering pump, alt and the bracketry.
This info is in the FAQ.
Fiver 06/87
Sixteen-O-Two-er 11/69
Nick
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:56 am

Post by Nick »

The data I'm looking at shows the HP/TQ for the stock B28 to be 181/180 with a compression ratio of 9.3:1. While the B34 to stand at 182/210 and compression ratio to be at 8:1. Seems like a lot of work for minimal gains in this instance, unless you were to raise the CR on the B34.
1980 528i Automatic
User avatar
CabbageFumes
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:07 pm
Location: Funkytown

Post by CabbageFumes »

The differences between b28 and b35 are substantial enough to justify the swap. Keep doing your homework. Better mileage, more power, smoother running. You'll agree sooner or later...
Last edited by CabbageFumes on Mon Dec 22, 2014 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fiver 06/87
Sixteen-O-Two-er 11/69
Nick
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:56 am

Post by Nick »

Everywhere I am looking I am coming up with the same data. North American, not European.
1980 528i Automatic
User avatar
CabbageFumes
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:07 pm
Location: Funkytown

Post by CabbageFumes »

Ok so keep your b28. Case closed.
Fiver 06/87
Sixteen-O-Two-er 11/69
pappentl
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:11 pm

Post by pappentl »

I've installed an M90 from a 1980 euro 635 with 218 hp and stock L-jet in my last '81. I currently am installing an M90 with 1.0 motronic, again with 218 hp but taken from an '84 euro 735i. Find a newer motor or one of the M90's, they really transform the car.
...tom
and now an '80 528i, the 7th and last in the series
1981 528i, no. 6 in a series... only 270 k miles
Nick
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:56 am

Post by Nick »

Have been doing some research, the M90 is very intriguing. Haven't seen this one mentioned before.
1980 528i Automatic
User avatar
wkohler
Posts: 1063
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Post by wkohler »

The US-spec 528i had 169 hp/170 lb-ft of torque. The US models were lower compression to utilize regular fuel.

The Euro 2.8 on the other hand, that's your 181hp/180 lb-ft motor. If I had a car with one of those in it, I wouldn't swap a 3.5L in. I do have one of those (E28) and I'm not swapping a 3.5L in.

I have a car with an M90 (M535i) and it is a great motor. They're not easy to come by though. The later "dirty" M30s (9/82 on) are great too (same power), but the M90 is a different experience.
Nick
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:56 am

Post by Nick »

Looks like I need to find a B34 or bore it out and put a B35 crank and pistons in.
1980 528i Automatic
Nick
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:56 am

Post by Nick »

Found a few tid bits of information tucked away here: http://www.firstfives.org/bboard/viewto ... sc&start=0

Looks like as long as I have the "bulges" on case I should be able to add the B32 crank and bore to the B32 pistons. 194 hp 210 lb·ft
1980 528i Automatic
User avatar
Falkenberg
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 am
Location: In Europe, far, far away.

Post by Falkenberg »

On my car I had:
M30B28 double zenith made in 1976
M30B35 (?), a 3.5 litre engine from a 1987 735i, motronic 1.3.

- the 2.8 revs more quickly, or at least it gave me tat impression, it feels more playful.
- the 3.5 has more torque starting from low rpms. With the 3.64 diff I can run 4th gear (1:1) in town most of the time, no need to switch gears..

the 3.5 was plug and play as far as the engine mounts were concerned. I had to swap the oil pump though, and the oil pan of course. And swap clutch, add a bearing, since the engine was taken from an automatic car.
1961 Simson AWO sport (Brasoveanca)
1968 BMW 114 2002
1976 BMW E12 528 (Malèna)
1987 Kawasaki GPz900r
1996 Moto Guzzi V75 PA NT
User avatar
Falkenberg
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 am
Location: In Europe, far, far away.

Post by Falkenberg »

Yes I think you might be able to do that, if you have a 1980 M30, you should be ok.
I ended up keeping the 2.8 crank (80mm) and bore the block to 89mm so that I could use pistons from a M30B30.
1961 Simson AWO sport (Brasoveanca)
1968 BMW 114 2002
1976 BMW E12 528 (Malèna)
1987 Kawasaki GPz900r
1996 Moto Guzzi V75 PA NT
Post Reply